Download Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman

Download Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman

You need to begin loving reading. Even you will certainly not be able to spend the book for all day long, you can likewise spend couple of times in a day for long times. It's not type of forceful activities. You could appreciate reviewing Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman all over you actually have need. Why? The offered soft file of this publication will reduce you in obtaining the definition. Yeah, obtain guide right here from the link that we share.

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman


Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman


Download Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman

Waiting to an improved thoughts and also minds are a must. It is not only done by the individuals that have large tasks. That's also not only conducted by the students or earners in addressing their duties troubles. Everybody has exact same chance to seek and also look forward for their life. Enriching the minds and ideas for much better way of life is a must. When you have actually made a decision the methods of how you get the problems and take the fixing, you must require deep thoughts and ideas.

Feel challenging to obtain this best seller publication? Why? We assume that best seller publication will always go out quickly. So, it's not to unusual when you will feel hard to obtain it in the book shop, or you need to bespeak Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman when you require it. Have enough time? Not everybody can wait on log minute to get guide. To conquer this problem, we are right here to give you option. It is not really difficult for us. We definitely help you by offering the lists of the new best seller books on the planet.

However, some individuals will certainly seek for the best seller book to review as the first recommendation. This is why; this Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman is presented to fulfil your necessity. Some people like reading this book Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman as a result of this popular publication, yet some love this due to favourite writer. Or, lots of likewise like reading this publication Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman considering that they actually have to read this publication. It can be the one that actually enjoy reading.

In offering the info, we likewise reveal various other book collections. We know that nowadays lots of people enjoy checking out so much. So, finding hundreds of guides below in this on-line publication is extremely simple. Searching and surfing can be done anywhere you are. It is the method you use the modern-day technology as web link to connect to this website. From this instance, we're truly sure that everybody demands are covered in some publications, the particular publications based on the subjects and also needs. As the Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, By Bart D. Ehrman that is now preventative.

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman

Review

“Offers a fascinating look into the field of textual criticism and evidence that Scriptures have been altered.” (Charleston Post & Courier)“Whichever side you sit on regarding Biblical inerrancy, this is a rewarding read.” (Dallas Morning News)“One of the unlikeliest bestsellers of the year.” (Washington Post)“Misquoting Jesus is a godsend.” (Philadelphia Inquirer)

Read more

About the Author

Bart D. Ehrman is one of the most renowned and controversial Bible scholars in the world today. He is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and is the author of more than twenty books, including the New York Times bestsellers How Jesus Became God; Misquoting Jesus; God’s Problem; Jesus, Interrupted; and Forged. He has appeared on Dateline NBC, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, CNN, History, and top NPR programs, as well as been featured in TIME, the New York Times, The Washington Post, The New Yorker, and other publications. He lives in Durham, North Carolina. Visit the author online at www.bartdehrman.com.

Read more

Product details

Paperback: 242 pages

Publisher: HarperOne; Reprint edition (February 5, 2007)

Language: English

ISBN-10: 0060859512

ISBN-13: 978-0060859510

Product Dimensions:

6 x 0.6 x 9 inches

Shipping Weight: 6.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)

Average Customer Review:

4.2 out of 5 stars

989 customer reviews

Amazon Best Sellers Rank:

#23,162 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Ehrman argues for two theses, one practical and one more abstract.The practical thesis can be summarized as: We do not possess any of the original writings of the New Testament, and the copies we have are riddled with negligent and/or intentional alterations. Therefore, the New Testament we read today, which is based upon numerous altered copies, is not very close to the original text. And if the original text is the Word of God, the Word of God is lost.The abstract thesis can be summarized as: For any text, both the author's and the reader's subjective beliefs and experiences condition the meaning of the words, and therefore color the interpretation of the text. As a result, there is no such thing as an objectively true interpretation of a text. The search for the "correct" meaning is fruitless. Therefore, no one can claim to know the true meaning of the text of the New Testament.The upshot? The New Testament we read today is of human, and not divine, origin (practical thesis), and, in any event, any claim to "the One True Interpretation" is in principle false (abstract thesis).I will not take a stand on Ehrman's claims but hope I've faithfully outlined them for people deciding whether to purchase the book. I am familiar with but not well-versed in either the New Testament or textual criticism. Nonetheless, I found his arguments and analysis easy to track. The broad historical information was interesting, and the biblical passages he focuses on to illustrate his points are engaging instead of arcane. Some may consider this book anti-religious, but Ehrman's tone is respectful and honest, not polemical. For such a short, accessible book, the reader can gain a lot from reading it.

A well written book about the evolution of the Bible, particularly the New Testament, and how our present text came to be in all its various forms. Dr. Ehrman begins with a brief summary of his own life. From an "ordinary kid" he becomes a fundamentalist Christian believing the Bible to be wholly inspired. During his graduate program in a Christian school he develops an interest in the wide variety of historical documents that have, through many generations come down to us a our present Bible. He becomes, in short, a textual-scholar, and has an epiphany!Ehrman quickly learns that there are no longer any "original texts" anywhere. The earliest texts found, more fragmented the farther back one goes, come from the 2nd century some 100 years after Jesus' death. None of the original Apostles, nor Paul are any longer alive at that point, and what early notes exist for geographically fragmented communities are already copies of lost originals. Even if the literal-original writing was "inspired by God" as fundamentalists claim, by the opening of the 2nd century the earliest copies of these writings have already passed through human hands and the real originals are no more. Except for the Christian community of Alexandria where professional scribes already existed, all of the early copies were made by amateur believers who, as it happened could read and write, and so copied texts for their congregations; sometimes well and sometimes poorly. It was not until late in the 4th century that more professional scribes assumed the copyist role.Roughly the first half of the book is taken up with the history of textual criticism. Ehrman leads us through early (17th century) classification attempts and the techniques developed to determine which texts were "more original" than others. Ehrman notes that in many many cases even that matter cannot be decided with any finality. That the modern obsession with the text began after the Reformation is no accident. Protestant scholars were far more compulsive about the text than Catholics. Protestant theology and doctrine rests entirely on the text, while Catholicism has its priestly class for precisely the task of interpreting the text in what ever form it takes. By the 18th century, scholars had identified some 30,000 textual variations in the manuscripts that come together as the then relatively stabilized New Testament.Most of these variations were simply mistakes made by non-professional copyists. Sometimes they left out a word or whole sentences. Sometimes what there were of literal originals were physically degraded even when first copied. Copyists sometimes had to "fill in the blanks", a smudged word, or a bleed-through from some earlier text on the page for example. So why not go back to the more professional Alexandrian texts and call those "closest to original"? Because while the vast majority of changes were copy errors, not all were merely that. Here and there changes were made for theological and socio-political reasons. In point of fact (something he does not mention) the Alexandrian scholars were among those who, by the early 5th Century, were considered among the heretical sects by the then solidifying Roman Church. Ehrman does not mention is the textual difference between the modern Western (Roman) and Eastern (Greek and Eastern European "Orthodox") churches. His aim is historical, and he does cover the early Greek texts whose alterations became mixed in with all of the others.In the second half of the book Ehrman covers three types of changes made deliberately by one group of copyists or another so as to make the text easier to read and better line up with the various theological opinions and social controversies of the time, each propounded by groups of believers who were doing their own copying! In the end, Ehrman is forced to conclude that even the lost originals were probably not autodidacts (texts dictated by God) because if God had wanted Christians to have his un-corrupted words in perpetuity, He would have made sure the originals survived.I gave the book 5 stars not because the book's subject was of great interest to me, but because Dr. Ehrman does such a marvelous job of treating a scholarly subject (many many references are provided) with easy to read language aimed at non-scholars of the subject like myself.

As a textual critic, Erhman does a thorough job of illustrating the meandering path the New Testament has taken from the original writings to what we read today. I don’t challenge his work as a critic and can easily accept the multitude of errors, amendments, exclusions, and modifications he presents. However, ones faith system doesn't necessarily depend on the validity of a virgin birth, the exact definition of the Trinity, or other miracles & orthodoxy. While one can’t deny these things, one can’t exactly confirm them either. That’s where Erhman loses me. He connects textual variations with a denial of orthodoxy – essentially, since God isn’t acting the way he expects, he abandons faith and uses textual criticism as proof. I don’t get that at all. There are hundreds of books about Abraham Lincoln. Some of them are near works of fiction and even the best have historical errors and bad assumptions. That doesn’t mean that Lincoln wasn’t the 16th President and never spoke at Gettysburg. I know the weight placed on the New Testament is much greater than any Lincoln biography, but that would seem to be a reason to extract what one can from the works rather than abandon them. It’s possible that the different gospels were included because they provided a different point of view. Maybe Mark was more data driven than Matthew and that difference allows another angle on Jesus’ teachings. I’m glad I read the book and appreciate Erhman’s scholarship, but I challenge his conclusions.

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman PDF
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman EPub
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman Doc
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman iBooks
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman rtf
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman Mobipocket
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman Kindle

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman PDF

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman PDF

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman PDF
Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, by Bart D. Ehrman PDF

Tidak ada komentar

Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.